![]() ![]() ![]() Then lastly, it depends on what else a user wants to do with the computer. But other graphics cards, in my very subjective opinion of course, do not matter because they’re oversized for the Shotcut preview window while not being good enough for a final export. If somebody wants to get an RTX 2060 at $350 just to have a capable hardware encoding option, that takes a lot of load off the CPU allowing it to be downsized significantly while still improving the export time. However, if somebody uses the fast or veryfast preset most of the time (which is the YouTube export preset default), libx264 will barely use additional cores because those presets are optimized to be light on CPU for real-time encoding (as in, ideal for game streamers using OBS).Īs for graphics card, that also depends on a user’s preferences. libx264 can use more cores with the slow preset if money is no object, but it gets into diminishing returns if on a budget. Having 8 cores for the Shotcut pipeline and 8 cores for libx264 is a very nice balance. It’s a very nuanced thing, and every user’s workload is different, so it’s all about a user understanding what they’re doing and how the hardware can best assist it.įor instance, if somebody is going to use libx264 software encoding using medium or slow preset most of the time, then having more than 8 cores (all being fast of course) is very helpful because libx264 itself is extremely CPU-heavy. I have a decent laptop (specs: Dell Inspirion with a Ryzen 5 2500, 32GB of RAM, Ubuntu Studio) with power management set to never turn off. Processing without hardware encoding checked, it took about 50 minutes. I was able to get it to export the same file at the 26% or higher usage and it took 24 minutes. There is a couple of transitions and HTML filters but nothing that should have caused such a long processing time. For a 20 minute video last night, it took over 2 hours to finish exporting. With it checked, after a random amount of processing it will drop down to 3% usage and never go above 4% after. Without it checked, it will peak at 100%. I’ve watched the processor usage and when hardware encoding is checked, it will peak at 30%. I’ve tried running it with hardware encoding with parallel processing, hardware encoding only, parallel processing only, and neither. Most of the videos I do are between 5 and 20 minutes in length. You can see the progress at Jobs located in the top right corner.I too am having similar issues. At File name, you type a name for the video. Select a location on your computer where you want to save the new video.ġ4. When you're done, you click on the Export File button.ġ3. If you want more advanced settings, you click on the Advanced button.ġ2. In the Presets section, you select a video format.ġ1. When you're done editing the video, you click on Export at the top.ġ0. So the videos should overlap each other a little bit.ĩ. You can create a fade transition effect by sliding the beginning of the second video slightly over the end of the first video. Drag the second video to the timeline and against the end of the first video.Ĩ. You can pause the video by clicking the pause button at the bottom of the video.ħ. The first video will immediately start playing. Within this window, you go to the location on your computer where the videos are. Click on Open File in the top left corner.ģ. Shotcut is a free and open-source cross-platform video editor for Microsoft Windows, Linux, and macOS.Ģ. How to put video clips together to make one video using Shotcut (free) The steps on this page work for MP4, MKV, AVI, WMV, MOV, FLV, and other video formats. This tutorial will show you step by step how to merge multiple videos into one video using a free open-source video editor. Windows Android Internet Gaming Linux Video CD/DVD How to merge multiple videos into one video
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |